| Linda Carroli is an arts and hypertext writer. She
has worked as a curator, consultant and manager in the cultural industries
in Australia. What is your role in fAf?
I am fAf's Australian Editor. I was employed in May 2001, with funds
from an Australia Council grant, to consolidate our Brisbane office
as the ‘home base’ for fAf. My role was also to pick
up some of the operational tasks so that Nisar Keshvani could be
more ‘out there’. A second Australia Council grant has
meant that I can continue working at fAf until May 2003.
What drew you to work for fAf?
I was interested in working for fAf because it intersects with my
interests and activities. fAf also keeps me in direct contact with
other practitioners and happenings in my field. First, as a Brisbane-based
writer, I had an established practice as an arts writer and critic
with special interest in new media arts, cultural theory and visual
arts. Second, I had developed an artistic practice in hypertext
and electronic writing over the past few years. Having worked variously
in the arts – as manager, consultant, curator, editor, journalist
and publicist – working for fAf seemed like a positive move
for me. I also felt that I had something to contribute to fAf –
during my initial interview with Paul Brown and Nisar Keshvani,
it became apparent that fAf was on the cusp of a transition which
has since been borne out through the LEA alliance and various projects
we are pursuing. Not having really known a lot about fAf's history
and position before my role was formalised, I realise I am rather
privileged to be working here and that I am in very esteemed company.
I had, of course, known Paul for a few years - not very well, just
enough to greet - and have enormous respect for him. I was interested
in working with Paul in this context.
You haven't been here for too long, has your role changed
in that time?
I have been at fAf for just over 12 months and it’s been something
of a steep learning curve. I have been defining my role over the
past year. It was originally intended to be purely administrative,
but I think I have elbowed some additional room for myself to take
on more of a managing editor role. I work in partnership with Nisar
and Paul, across all the operations of fAf, including content, management,
staffing, strategic direction, funding and artistic direction.
In this second year, I would like to be more 'out there' - women
all too often end up working behind the scenes in support roles
and in the interests of cyber/feminism, gender equity, or whatever
you want to call it, I feel it's important to be more active in
my role. fAf, ASTN and LEA have had remarkable women - like Judy
and Annick - working in and leading them.
I have thoroughly enjoyed the flexibility of my role but have to
contend with the fact that, as with so many arts organisations in
Australia, there is simply not enough funding in fAf to pay for
the work that needs to be done. So, the volunteers and students
rate a special mention and a very special thank you because without
them there is no fAf.
What is it that you especially love about fAf?
Love is perhaps a difficult word to apply to my work with fAf without
sounding info-fetishistic. However, there are many things I appreciate
and enjoy about my work and there are many things I am passionate
about which I either bring with me to fAf or which crop up in my
fAf life.
I truly enjoy the flexibility and the potential of fAf: not just
what fAf has achieved but what I think it will be achieving over
the next few years. I think the core team of Nisar, Paul and I work
well together considering that fAf is a small, predominantly volunteer,
geographically-dispersed organisation. I am astounded by fAf’s
longevity and the fact that we have been able to achieve so much
with so little. One example of this is fAf's screening programme,
fineArt in Motion. It’s a remarkable achievement. To date
it has travelled to some 10 locales around the world – in
Asia, Australia, Latin America – and the project was put together
with a small amount of in kind support from our partners. I often
feel like I am reaping the rewards of the effort that previous fAf
editors have put in.
fAf is an innovator and very much a part of, if not a protagonist
in, the new media arts community. It's important to be perceived
and regarded as artists and writers rather than as media. Individually,
Nisar, Paul and I are established in our own ways in the new media
arts community and fAf has developed and grown in line with developments
and growth in new media arts generally and globally. It’s
apparent in my dealings with artists and theorists worldwide that
fAf is very well regarded as a professional publication. It’s
a reputation that has been built over years and I am so pleased
that we have been able to sustain that professionalism and subsequent
relevance to new media arts practitioners.
fAf is part of a noisy and ongoing dialogue in new media arts and,
to this end, we have partnered with a variety of organisations.
As an organisation and a publication, our ethos is that we'd rather
work in partnership and collaborate, than compete with other organisations
in the field. We are very much ensconced in the infrastructure of
new media arts practice and I'd like to think that we share a kind
of living history with other new media arts bodies. So, there is
an experience and practice of connectivity and diversity which I
especially love about fAf.
Another aspect of fAf’s operations I appreciate is the fact
that we actively support emerging new media communities worldwide
as well as actively encourage culturally diverse perspectives. Our
publishing policies are about acknowledging and respecting diversity,
be they cultural, geographic, technological or linguistic.
Being part of a new leadership team in fAf, what are your predictions
for its future, and its role or place in the new media/art/technology
community?
From what I understand of fAf’s history and development, it
was set up specifically for the online environment. Since then,
it has consistently been enabled by and has taken advantage of developments
in online technology. fAf has a strong sense of its purpose as a
news and information service and we will continue to use new technology
to enhance our service delivery. For example, establishing a web
presence meant that fAf could grow and provide more diverse information
and content including a gallery, art resources, theoretical writing
and reviews. We have been able to use the web in a canny way and
as the next generation web and electronic devices make themselves
known, we’ll need to be responding to that as well.
I was reading an essay by Johanna Drucker recently - she was writing
about the journal M/E/A/N/I/N/G in an anthology of artist writings.
I really loved the way she characterised this journal: "During
its ten-year existence from 1986 to 1996, M/E/A/N/I/N/G effectively
created a zone of critical discussion that was independent of academic
or commercial art interests. The journal combined rigourous theoretical
polemics and individual artists' voices, and gained respect and
visibility that pushed it beyond a local audience of insiders. M/E/A/N/I/N/G's
longevity was based on the fact that through dialogue and articulation
it suceeded in producing a community for whom it served a vital
purpose: [meaninful] exchange around personal and professional issues
directly related to the experience of the artists who wrote and
read its pages." I'd really love to have that kind of critical
culture around fAf: I really want to be able to facilitate and participate
in that for fAf.
There are, of course, political and contextual issues which need
to be addressed and kept abreast of. If I could rattle off a modest
wishlist for fAf, it would most obviously be to see us with appropriate
funds, staffing and resources so that we can experiment and innovate
with content, be more responsive to change, needs and the like.
We will also be better placed to provide a comprehensive news and
information service that is unique in the world, provide resources
to artists and writers to develop new work, continue to develop
collaborations and partnerships which benefit the field.
Biography
Since 1985, I have written as a journalist, essayist and
critical writer. I am an experienced researcher having worked on
a number of academic, media and community research projects, with
special interest in arts and culture. I have worked in digital,
print and broadcast media and my writings have also been published
locally and internationally.
In 1997, I completed a Writer's Residency as part of the Australian
Network for Art and Technology project, *Water Writes Always in
*Plural, working collaboratively online with Josephine Wilson to
produce a hypertext for the Web. This work was awarded the inaugural
Salt Hill Award for Hypertext (University of Syracuse, NY) in 1998
and received an Honourable Mention in the trAce/AltX International
Hypertext Competition. It is also required or suggested reading
in approximately 20 university courses in the United States, Asia
and Australia. I continue to produce hypertexts and my recent works
have included: cipher (also with Josephine Wilson), speak: a hypertext
essay and a work in progress, racconto.
|